Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
Comparing Corneal Biomechanical Parameters Between Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma Using Corvis St Publisher Pubmed



Azimi A1 ; Nazarpour Servak M1 ; Nowroozzadeh MH1 ; Razmi H1 ; Fathian AM1 ; Nasiri Shirazi F1 ; Tabatabaei SM2
Authors

Source: BMC Ophthalmology Published:2025


Abstract

Background: To compare corneal biomechanical properties between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG) using CorVis ST. Methods: Thirty-three eyes of 33 patients with PXG and 29 eyes of 29 patients with POAG were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. All eyes underwent CorVis ST. Biomechanical parameters at the first and second applanation and highest concavity were measured. Man-Whitney U test and stepwise linear regression were used to compare the parameters between groups. Results: The mean age was 67.1 ± 7.9 and 70.3 ± 7.1 years in the POAG and PXG groups, respectively (P = 0.072). Eighteen patients in each group were male (P = 0.549). Intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry was not different between groups (P = 0.112) while the PXG group had higher biomechanically corrected IOP (14.3 ± 3.5 mmHg vs. 15.9 ± 3.4 mmHg; P = 0.042). Central corneal thickness was lower in the PXG group (546 ± 29 μm vs. 523 ± 37 μm; P = 0.008). A2 velocity was lower in the PXG group (P = 0.008). The highest concavity (HC) deformation amplitude and deflection length and peak distance were lower in the PXG group (p < 0.05). The PXG eyes had a higher stress-strain index (1.29 ± 0.26 vs. 1.42 ± 0.27; P = 0.022). Conclusion: The results of the current investigation are in favor of the presence of a stiffer cornea in the PXG group. © The Author(s) 2025.
Other Related Docs
4. Corneal Profile in Primary Congenital Glaucoma, Acta Ophthalmologica (2017)
8. Four-Year Changes in Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Children, Clinical and Experimental Optometry (2019)
11. Total Corneal Refractive Power and Shape in Down Syndrome, European Journal of Ophthalmology (2021)
16. Association Between Refractive Errors and Ocular Biometry in Iranian Adults, Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research (2015)