Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
Reliability and Validation of the Turkish Version of the Low Back Outcome Score Publisher Pubmed



Alhomedah G1 ; Citaker S1 ; Gunaydin G1 ; Sezer R2 ; Khan F3
Authors

Source: Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica Published:2020


Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to validate the Turkish version of the Low Back Outcome Score and check its reliability in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP). Methods: Overall, 105 patients [81 women and 24 men; mean age: 49.5 years (18–65 years)] with a complaint of LBP for at least 3 months were included in this study. Test-retest reliability was assessed after 7 days. Overall score of LBOS was compared with the overall scores of “Rolland-Morris Disability Questionnaire,” “Oswestry Disability Index,” “Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale,” “SF-36,” and “Bournemouth Questionnaire for Back Pain” to calculate the convergent validity by using Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: The questionnaire was noted to have high internal consistency. The test-retest analysis revealed an excellent correlation (ICC=0.80). Pearson correlation coefficient of the LBOS was assessed using VAS and had an excellent correlation with all the ques-tionnaires included in this study. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the LBOS questionnaire appeared to be a valid and reliable outcome measure. Level of Evidence: Level III, Diagnostic study. © 2020, AVES. All rights reserved.
Other Related Docs
11. The Validity and Reliability of the Functional Rating Index for Evaluating Low Back Pain in Athletes, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports (2015)
17. Prevalence of Low Back Pain Among Athletes: A Systematic Review, Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation (2018)