Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):

Share By

Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues Publisher Pubmed

Sabour S^{1, 2} ; Ghassemi F³

Source: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Published:2016

Abstract

[No abstract available]

Related Docs

View other Related Docs

1. Submaximal Step Tests to Estimate Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Healthy Adults: Methodological Issues About Validity and Reliability, Sports Medicine (2016)

2. Letter to the Editor [5], Retina (2016)

3. Comments on “Reproducibility of Digital Measurements of Lower-Limb Deformity on Plain Radiographs and Agreement With Ct Measurements” by Sorin G, Pasquier G, Drumez E, Arnould A, Migaud H, Putman S Published in Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016;102:423–28. Common Mistake and Methodological Issue to Avoid Mismanagement, Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research (2016)

Experts (# of related papers)

Fariba Ghassemi (8)

Other Related Docs

4. Comments on “Reproducibility of Digital Measurements of Lower-Limb Deformity on Plain Radiographs and Agreement With Ct Measurements” by G. Sorin, G. Pasquier, E. Drumez, A. Arnould, H. Migaud, S. Putman Published in Orthop & Traumat: Surgery & Research 2016,102: 423–28. Common Mistake and Methodological Issue to Avoid Mismanagement, Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Traumatologique (2016)

5. Choroidal Thickness Measurements in Subjects on 3 Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Machines: Common Mistake in Reproducibility Analysis, International Ophthalmology (2018)

6. Letter to Editor Regarding: “Between Human and Ai: Methodological Issues on Reliability, Effectiveness and Accuracy to Avoid Misinterpretation” by Semeraro Et Al., Current Medical Research and Opinion (2024)

7. Comments on “New Insights Into Glioma Frequency Maps: From Genetic and Transcriptomic Correlate to Survival Prediction”, International Journal of Cancer (2023)

8. The Validity and Reliability of a Signal Impact Assessment Tool: Statistical Issue to Avoid Misinterpretation, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety (2016)

Style	Citing Format
MLA	Sabour S, Ghassemi F. "Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues." Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 254, no. 10, 2016, pp. 2073-2074.
APA	Sabour S, Ghassemi F (2016). Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 254(10), 2073-2074.
Chicago	Sabour S, Ghassemi F. "Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues." Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 254, no. 10 (2016): 2073-2074.
Harvard	Sabour S, Ghassemi F (2016) 'Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues', Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 254(10), pp. 2073-2074.
Vancouver	Sabour S, Ghassemi F. Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2016;254(10):2073-2074.
BibTex	@article{ author = {Sabour S and Ghassemi F}, title = {Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues}, journal = {Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology}, volume = {254}, number = {10}, pages = {2073-2074}, year = {2016} }
RIS	TY - JOUR AU - Sabour S AU - Ghassemi F TI - Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues JO - Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology VL - 254 IS - 10 SP - 2073 EP - 2074 PY - 2016 ER -