Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Cad Cam Endocrowns Made of Feldspathic Ceramic, Zirconia Lithium Silicate, and Lithium Disilicate: A Two-Year Mixed Cohort Study Publisher Pubmed

Summary: Do endocrowns last? Study finds high success rate for ceramic endocrowns in treated teeth. #Endocrowns #DentalRestoration

Jalali S¹ ; Asgari N² ; Pirooz P³ ; Younespour S⁴ ; Atri F⁵
Source: Journal of Dentistry Published:2024

Abstract

Objective: Endocrowns can be fabricated from various materials as a treatment option for endodontically treated teeth. This mixed cohort study aimed to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of Endocrowns made of feldspathic, zirconia lithium silicate, and lithium disilicate ceramics using a chairside CAD/CAM system. Methods: The present study compared the clinical outcomes of 141 Endocrown restorations in posterior teeth of 85 patients in a two-year follow-up. The efficacy of restorations was evaluated in three aspects: esthetics, biological response, and function, with the aid of the FDI guideline, and presented as descriptive analyses. Additionally, the data were analyzed using Chi-square and Spearman correlation tests. The significance level was set at p = 0.05. Results: The study findings revealed that the type of restorations (feldspathic ceramic, zirconia lithium silicate, and lithium disilicate) (p > 0.05) and underlying teeth (molars and premolars) (p > 0.05) play no part in restorations’ failure. Caries' recurrence is primarily responsible for the failure of the endocrowns. Secondary caries and radiolucency were observed in four teeth (2.83 %). The clinical efficacy of 126 restorations (89.36 %) fell into the category of “clinically excellent” and “clinically good.” Ten restorations (7.09 %) were classified as “clinically sufficient/satisfactory,” and only five restorations (3.54 %) needed replacement due to having “clinically unsatisfactory” and “clinically poor” quality. Conclusions: Endocrowns showed a high success rate and durability in the short term, therefore can be considered a safe choice for restoring endodontically treated teeth. It is worth noting that caries were the most common reason for the failure of the restorations. Clinical significance: Endocrowns made of different ceramics have been proven reliable restorations for endodontically treated molars and premolars. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd