Bone Healing Around Titanium Implants in a Preclinical Model of Bile Duct Ligation-Induced Liver Injury Publisher Pubmed



Talebian R^{1, 2} ; Kampleitner C^{3, 4, 5} ; Sagl B⁶ ; Kuchler U⁷ ; Dehpour AR^{2, 8} ; Gruber R^{1, 5, 9}
Source: Clinical Oral Implants Research Published:2021

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic liver disease increases the risk for periodontal disease and osteoporotic fractures, but its impacts on bone regeneration remain unknown. Herein, we studied the impact of liver cirrhosis on peri-implant bone formation. Material and Methods: A total of 20 male Wistar rats were randomly divided into two groups: one with the common bile duct ligated (BDL) and the respective sham-treated control group (SHAM). After four weeks of disease induction, titanium mini-screws were inserted into the tibia. Successful induction of liver cirrhosis was confirmed by the presence of clinical symptoms. Another four weeks later, peri-implant bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV) and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) were determined by histomorphometric analysis. Results: Peri-implant bone formation was not significantly different between the SHAM and BDL groups. In the cortical compartment, the median percentage of peri-implant new bone was 10.1% (95% CI of mean 4.0–35.7) and 22.5% (13.8–30.6) in the SHAM and BDL groups, respectively (p =.26). Consistently, the new bone in direct contact with the implant was 18.1% (0.4–37.8) and 23.3% (9.2–32.8) in SHAM and BDL groups, respectively (p =.38). When measuring the medullary compartment, the new bone area was 7.1% (4.8–10.4) and 10.4% (7.2–13.5) in the SHAM and BDL groups, respectively (p =.17). Medullary new bone in direct contact with the implant was 10.0% (1.2–50.4) and 20.6% (16.8–35.3) in SHAM and BDL groups, respectively, and thus comparable between the two groups (p =.46). Conclusions: Bile duct ligation has no significant impact on the early stages of peri-implant bone formation. © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.