Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
The Environmental Profile of a Community’S Health: A Cross-Sectional Study on Tobacco Marketing in 16 Countries; [Profil Environnemental De La Sante D’Une Communaute: Etude Transversale Sur Le Marketing Du Tabac Dans 16 Pays]; [El Perfil Ambiental De La Salud De Una Comunidad: Un Estudio Transversal Sobre La Publicidad Del Tabaco En 16 Paises] Publisher Pubmed



Savell E1 ; Gilmore AB1 ; Sims M1 ; Mony PK2 ; Koon T3 ; Yusoff K4 ; Lear SA5 ; Seron P6 ; Ismail N7 ; Calik KBT8 ; Rosengren A9 ; Bahonar A10 ; Kumar R11 ; Vijayakumar K12 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Savell E1
  2. Gilmore AB1
  3. Sims M1
  4. Mony PK2
  5. Koon T3
  6. Yusoff K4
  7. Lear SA5
  8. Seron P6
  9. Ismail N7
  10. Calik KBT8
  11. Rosengren A9
  12. Bahonar A10
  13. Kumar R11
  14. Vijayakumar K12
  15. Kruger A13
  16. Swidan H14
  17. Gupta R15
  18. Igumbor E16
  19. Afridi A17
  20. Rahman O18
  21. Chifamba J19
  22. Zatonska K20
  23. Mohan V21
  24. Mohan D21
  25. Lopezjaramillo P22
  26. Avezum A23
  27. Poirier P24
  28. Orlandini A25
  29. Li W26
  30. Mckee M27
  31. Rangarajan S3
  32. Yusuf S3
  33. Chow CK28

Source: Bulletin of the World Health Organization Published:2015


Abstract

Objective To examine and compare tobacco marketing in 16 countries while the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control requires parties to implement a comprehensive ban on such marketing. Methods Between 2009 and 2012, a kilometre-long walk was completed by trained investigators in 462 communities across 16 countries to collect data on tobacco marketing. We interviewed community members about their exposure to traditional and non-traditional marketing in the previous six months. To examine differences in marketing between urban and rural communities and between high-, middle- and low-income countries, we used multilevel regression models controlling for potential confounders. Findings Compared with high-income countries, the number of tobacco advertisements observed was 81 times higher in low-income countries (incidence rate ratio, IRR: 80.98; 95% confidence interval, CI: 4.15–1578.42) and the number of tobacco outlets was 2.5 times higher in both low- and lower-middle-income countries (IRR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.17–5.67 and IRR: 2.52; CI: 1.23–5.17, respectively). Of the 11 842 interviewees, 1184 (10%) reported seeing at least five types of tobacco marketing. Self-reported exposure to at least one type of traditional marketing was 10 times higher in low-income countries than in high-income countries (odds ratio, OR: 9.77; 95% CI: 1.24–76.77). For almost all measures, marketing exposure was significantly lower in the rural communities than in the urban communities. Conclusion Despite global legislation to limit tobacco marketing, it appears ubiquitous. The frequency and type of tobacco marketing varies on the national level by income group and by community type, appearing to be greatest in low-income countries and urban communities. © 2015, World Health Organization.
Other Related Docs