Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
Effects of Impression Levels and Trays on the Accuracy of Impressions Taken From Angulated Implants Publisher Pubmed



Geramipanah F1, 2 ; Sahebi M1 ; Davari M3 ; Hajimahmoudi M1, 4 ; Rakhshan V5, 6
Authors

Source: Clinical Oral Implants Research Published:2015


Abstract

Background and purpose: It is crucial to keep the misfit of the abutment-fixture unit at the lowest possible rate. There are a few controversial studies on the accuracy of impression making of angulated implants, and much fewer (and controversial) studies on the abutment-level impression technique, which is a convenient and clinically favorable method. Besides, there are no studies on comparison of sectional vs. full-arch trays. We aimed to assess these. Methods: A trapezoidal model with four angulated implants installed at 20° and 30° buccal tilts was fabricated. Forty impressions were taken from this model, with two groups of full-arch and sectional custom trays (n = 2 × 20), each divided into two subgroups of implant-level and abutment-level techniques (n = 2 × 2 × 10 in four subgroups). Absolute and non-absolute linear and angular impression errors were estimated by comparing the fabricated casts with the model, using a coordinate measuring machine. The effects of sectional/full-arch trays and abutment-level and fixture-level techniques on impression accuracies were analyzed using one- and two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA), Tukey, Mann-Whitney, and one-sample t-tests (α = 0.05, Mann-Whitney's α using the Bonferroni Bonferroni method). Results: No significant differences between the absolute linear errors of the two trays (P = 0.100 [ANOVA]) and the two levels (P = 0.400 [ANOVA]) were observed. The assessment of absolute angular errors showed no significant differences (all P values ≥ 0.4 [ANOVA]). The difference between the linear errors in the full-arch vs. sectional trays was not significant in the fixture-level group (P = 0.290). However, in the abutment-level group, the linear error was significantly greater in the sectional tray compared to full-arch tray (P = 0.013, α = 0.025 [Mann-Whitney]). Conclusions: Using sectional trays might not be advantageous over full-arch trays. Sectional trays are not recommended for taking abutment-level impressions. The abutment-level impression technique is as accurate as the studied fixture-level technique. Increasing the angle of implants' divergence from 40° to 60° might not usually lead to a significant increase in the errors, particularly when using abutment-level impressions. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
2. Effect of Arch Size and Implant Angulations on the Accuracy of Implant Impressions, European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (2021)
3. A Comparison of Implant Impression Precision: Different Materials and Techniques, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry (2018)
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
17. Do Type and Shape of Scan Bodies Affect Accuracy and Time of Digital Implant Impressions?, European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (2020)