Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
Keratometric Indices for Detecting the Type of Keratoconus: A Combined Discriminant Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Yousefi A1 ; Hashemi H2 ; Khanlari M1 ; Amanzadeh K1 ; Aghamirsalim M3 ; Asgari S1
Authors

Source: Clinical and Experimental Optometry Published:2020


Abstract

Background: This study sought to determine the diagnostic ability of anterior, posterior and total keratometric indices in discriminating keratoconus (KCN) stages 1 to 4 from normal corneas. Methods: Anterior and posterior simulated keratometry (sim-Ksteep and sim-Kflat), maximum keratometry (Kmax), Kmax y co-ordinate, anterior and posterior radii of curvature centred on the thinnest point (ARC-3 mm and PRC-3 mm), and anterior, posterior, and total asphericity (Q-value) measured by Pentacam were extracted from electronic medical records of 200 KCN and 200 normal cases. Stepwise leave-one-out cross-validation and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) were used to detect the best set of indices for differentiating normal from low-grade (stages 1–2, Kmax ≤ 53.00 D) and high-grade (stages 3–4, Kmax > 53.00 D) KCN. Results: Mean age in KCN and normal groups was 33.10 ± 7.48 and 32.24 ± 9.00 years (p = 0.332), respectively. In the low-grade KCN group, PRC-3 mm (AUROC = 0.986), Kmax (AUROC = 0.979), and Kmax y co-ordinate (AUROC = 0.824) performed best, and the difference in AUROC between PRC-3 mm and Kmax was not significant (p = 0.153). In the high-grade KCN group, Kmax (AUROC = 1.000), PRC-3 mm (AUROC = 0.998), posterior Ksteep (AUROC = 0.970), posterior Q-value (AUROC = 0.940), and posterior Kflat (AUROC = 0.894) performed best, and there was no significant difference in AUROC values between Kmax and PRC-3 mm (p = 0.307) or between posterior Ksteep and posterior Q-value (p = 0.113). Conclusions: Among the studied keratometric indices, PRC-3 mm and Kmax appear to have the best ability for detecting mild to severe KCN. The next best factors which showed good discrimination ability were Kmax y co-ordinate in low-grade cases and posterior Ksteep and Q-value in high-grade cases. © 2019 Optometry Australia
Other Related Docs
13. Pentacam, Diagnostics in Ocular Imaging: Cornea# Retina# Glaucoma and Orbit (2020)
19. Total Corneal Refractive Power and Shape in Down Syndrome, European Journal of Ophthalmology (2021)
20. Is Keratoconus More Severe in Pediatric Population?, International Ophthalmology (2017)