Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
Corrigendum to “Nonisothermal Cure Kinetics of Epoxy/Mnxfe3-Xo4 Nanocomposites” [Prog. Org. Coat. 140C (2020) 105505] (Progress in Organic Coatings (2020) 140, (S0300944019312627), (10.1016/J.Porgcoat.2019.105505)) Publisher



Jouyandeh M1, 2 ; Paran SMR1, 2 ; Khadem SSM1 ; Ganjali MR1, 3 ; Akbari V4 ; Vahabi H5, 6 ; Saeb MR4
Authors

Source: Progress in Organic Coatings Published:2021


Abstract

The authors of this work would like to declare that they regrettably missed referring to a previously published paper in which the reference (control) samples EP and EP/Fe3O4 were studied. Actually, to discuss about cure kinetics of epoxy nanocomposite containing Mn-doped Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the original article, we compared the results and cure parameters of EP/Mn-Fe3O4 with the aforementioned EP and EP/Fe3O4 as reference samples. In this sense, data on the reference samples in Fig. 1, Fig. 3, Table 2 and Fig. 6 of the published manuscript are now cited [1]. The table and figures are corrected as follows: Fig. 1. DSC thermograms recorded for neat epoxy (EP) [1], and EP/Fe3O4 [1] and EP/Mn-Fe3O4 nanocomposites at heating rates of 5, 10, 15 and 20 °C/min with their corresponding cure label [13]. Fig. 3. Evolution of activation energy for EP [1], EP/Fe3O4 [1] and EP/Mn-Fe3O4 nanocomposites estimated by (a) differential Friedman model and (b) integral KAS model. Fig. 6. Comparison of experimental data with the kinetic models for EP/Mn-Fe3O4 nanocomposites with EP [1], EP/Fe3O4 [1] reference samples at heating rate of 5 °C/min based on Friedman and KAS model. Table 1. The values of αp, αm and αp∞ obtained from Malek model at various heating rates. [Table presented] The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience. © 2021 Elsevier B.V.
Other Related Docs
11. Cure Kinetics of Samarium-Doped Fe3o4/Epoxy Nanocomposites, Journal of Composites Science (2022)