Evaluation of Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes After Open Rhinoplasty: A Quasi-Experimental Study by the Aid of Roe and Rhino Questionnaires Publisher Pubmed



Haddady Abianeh S^{1, 2} ; Moradi Bajestani S^{2, 3} ; Rahmati J^{1, 2} ; Shahrbaf MA⁴ ; Fatehi Meybodi A¹
Source: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Published:2021

Abstract

Background and Aims: Rhinoplasty is one of the common plastic surgery procedures which has a high rate in Iran. There are several tools for assessing the outcomes and quality of life after this surgical procedure which rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) questionnaire and rhinoplasty health inventory and nasal outcomes are two of them. The aim of this study was to investigate the aesthetic and functional outcomes of rhinoplasty by the aid of ROE and RHINO scales in patients who presented to a referral center in Iran. Materials and Methods: This prospective, quasi-experimental study was performed on patients who referred to the plastic surgery clinic of Imam Khomeini hospital complex during 2017 to 2019 and underwent open rhinoplasty. ROE and RHINO questionnaires were filled by patients before and 6 months after the surgery. Surgical outcomes and aesthetic satisfaction rate were evaluated in different age groups, genders and educational levels. The data were analyzed by version 21 of SPSS software. Results: ROE score increased from 51.27 ± 10.54 to 79.6 ± 9.67 (P < 0.001). In addition, RHINO score increased from 64.13 ± 11.43 to 83.36 ± 11.03 (P < 0.001). The most common satisfaction factors among patients in this study were nose feels more natural in 62% of patients and tip rotation is good in 32% of patients. Furthermore, the most common causes of dissatisfaction in patients were nose too wide in 25% of patients and tip bulbous in 25% of patients. Conclusion: ROE and RHINO scales are effective for assessing rhinoplasty outcomes. The satisfaction rate of rhinoplasty is high in Iran and is related to the natural shape of the nose in addition to the tip rotation. Level of Evidence IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. © 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.