Healthcare Priority-Setting Criteria and Social Values in Iran: An Investigation of Local Evidence Publisher Pubmed



Goudarzi Z¹ ; Bijlmakers L² ; Nouhi M³ ; Jahangiri R⁴ ; Heydari M⁵ ; Simangolwa W^{6, 7} ; Hakimzadeh SM⁴ ; Jara KT⁸
Source: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care Published:2023

Abstract

Introduction Integrating social values into health technology assessment processes is an important component of proper healthcare priority setting. This study aims to identify social values related to healthcare priority setting in Iran. Method A scoping review was conducted on original studies that investigating social values in the healthcare system in Iran. The databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and EBSCO were searched with no restrictions on time and language. The reported criteria were clustered using Sham's framework of social value analysis in health policy. Results Twenty-one studies published between 2008 and 2022 met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen of the included studies followed a quantitative approach with different methods to identify criteria, and the remaining seven studies used a qualitative approach. A total of fifty-five criteria were extracted and clustered into necessity, quality, sustainability, and process categories. Only six studies found criteria that were related to processes. Only three studies used public opinions as a source of value identification and eleven studies investigated the weight of criteria. None of the included studies explored the interdependency of the criteria. Conclusion Evidence suggests that several criteria other than cost per health unit also need to be considered in healthcare priority setting. Previous studies have paid little attention to the social values that underlie priority setting and policy-making processes. To reach consensus on social values related to healthcare priority setting, future researches need to involve broader stakeholders' perspectives as a valuable source of social values in a fair process. © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press.