Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
Development and Initial Validation of Parent and Child Versions of the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score Publisher Pubmed



Naddei R1, 2 ; Ridella F3 ; Bovis F4 ; Trincianti C3 ; Avrusin I5 ; Januskeviciute G6 ; Burrone M3 ; Rebollogimenez A1 ; Minden K7, 8 ; Ekelund M9, 10 ; Barone P11 ; Rumbarozenfelde I12 ; Shafaie N13 ; Swart JF14 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Naddei R1, 2
  2. Ridella F3
  3. Bovis F4
  4. Trincianti C3
  5. Avrusin I5
  6. Januskeviciute G6
  7. Burrone M3
  8. Rebollogimenez A1
  9. Minden K7, 8
  10. Ekelund M9, 10
  11. Barone P11
  12. Rumbarozenfelde I12
  13. Shafaie N13
  14. Swart JF14
  15. Ruperto N15
  16. Ravelli A16
  17. Consolaro A1, 3

Source: Rheumatology Published:2025


Abstract

Objective: To develop parent- and child-centred versions of the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS) and to provide preliminary evidence of their validity. Methods: Validation analyses were conducted on two large multinational datasets of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and included assessment of construct validity, internal consistency and structure, discriminative validity, responsiveness to change, and predictive validity. Results: The parJADAS and patJADAS include four parent/patient-reported outcomes, each measured on a 0-10 scale: assessment of overall disease activity; rating of pain intensity; assessment of activity of joint disease; and duration of morning stiffness. Both scores are calculated as the simple linear sum of the scores of their four components, which yield for both of them a global score of 0-40. The parJADAS and patJADAS demonstrated good construct validity, yielding high correlations with other JIA composite disease activity measures and moderate correlations with physician global rating and joint counts. Internal consistency was satisfactory, with Cronbach's α > 0.80, and exploratory factor analysis showed that both indices are monodimensional. Both instruments discriminated well between different disease states, with discriminative ability being unaffected by the presence of damage; proved able to predict important disease outcomes; and showed fair responsiveness to clinically important change, with standardized response mean of 0.71. Conclusion: Both parJADAS and patJADAS were found to possess good measurement properties and to serve as a surrogate of physicians' evaluations. Regular home completion of the two instruments through digital technologies offers a suitable and pragmatic approach to deliver remote symptom monitoring and telehealth. © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved.
Other Related Docs
6. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis, Open Access Rheumatology: Research and Reviews (2019)
10. The Validity and Reliability of the Functional Rating Index for Evaluating Low Back Pain in Athletes, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports (2015)