Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Share By
Psychometric Evaluation of the Hamilton Inventory to Evaluate Signs and Symptoms in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (Crps) Publisher



Farzad M1, 2 ; Packham T3 ; Macdermid J1, 4 ; Mohammadi F2 ; Hosseini SA5 ; Kamrani RS6 ; Shariatzadeh H7 ; Koushan A6 ; Kalantar SH8 ; Bakhshi E2
Authors

Source: Journal of Hand Therapy Published:2025


Abstract

Background: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating condition with profound physical and psychological impacts, necessitating comprehensive assessment tools for effective evaluation. Purpose: This study aimed to validate the Persian version of the Hamilton Inventory for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (HI-CRPS) and assess its reliability and validity in individuals diagnosed with CRPS. Study Design: A cross-sectional clinical measurement study evaluated the Persian version of HI-CRPS. Methods: A sample of 64 individuals diagnosed with CRPS from pain and hand surgeon clinics completed the Persian versions of the patient-reported (PR-HI-CRPS) and clinicians based (CB-HI-CRPS). Test-retest reliability was assessed after 1 week, and responsiveness was measured after 3 months. Baseline scores, ceiling effects, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and construct validity (correlations with related measures) were examined. Effect sizes and standardized response means (SRM) were calculated to gauge responsiveness. Results: Baseline scores for PR-HI-CRPS and CB-HI-CRPS were 77.8 and 14.9, respectively. Around 18% of PR-HI-CRPS and 16% of CB-HI-CRPS respondents exhibited ceiling effects. Internal consistency for PR-HI-CRPS (Cronbach's alpha: 0.71–0.91) and CB-HI-CRPS (alpha: 0.90) was satisfactory. PR-HI-CRPS (ICC: 0.86) and CB-HI-CRPS (ICC: 0.97) showed robust test-retest reliability. Construct validity was confirmed by significant correlations between PR-HI-CRPS subscales and related measures (p < 0.01). Structural validity was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. PR-HI-CRPS displayed an effect size of 0.79 and a standardized response mean (SRM) of 0.88. Conclusions: The Persian version of the HI-CRPS demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness. It can be relied upon to assess CRPS symptoms, functional limitations, and psychosocial impacts. © 2025 The Authors
Related Docs
View other Related Docs
1. Severity of Persistent Pain and Disability Can Accurately Screen for Presence of Pain Catastrophizing and Fear of Performing Wrist Movements in Individuals With Distal Radius Fracture, Musculoskeletal Science and Practice (2022)
2. Psychometric Validation of the Persian Version of the Lysholm Score, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (2025)
3. Research Paper: The Psychometric Features of the Patient-Rated Wrist; Evaluation in Iranians With Scaphoid or Distal Radius Fracture, Iranian Rehabilitation Journal (2021)
Experts (# of related papers)
View all Related Experts
Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari (11)
Soofia Naghdi Dorbati (9)
Other Related Docs
4. Responsiveness and Longitudinal Validity of the Persian Version of Comi to Physiotherapy in Patients With Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain, Scandinavian Journal of Pain (2020)
5. Persian Translation and Validation of the Back Pain Functional Scale, Physiotherapy Theory and Practice (2018)
6. Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Assessment of the Persian Version of the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire, BMC Sports Science# Medicine and Rehabilitation (2022)
7. Validation of the Persian Version of the Brief Pain Inventory (Bpi-P) in Chronic Pain Patients, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (2017)
8. Minimal Important Difference of Berg Balance Scale, Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment and Dynamic Gait Index in Chronic Stroke Survivors, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases (2024)
9. Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain, Asian Spine Journal (2019)
10. Single Item Presenteeism Question: Reliability and Validity of Persian Version in Participants With Low Back Pain, Work (2018)
11. Responsiveness of the Persian Version of Oxford Shoulder Score in Subjects With Shoulder Pain: Brief Report, Tehran University Medical Journal (2020)
12. The Persian Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire: Validation in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain, Scientific World Journal (2021)
13. Reliability and Validity of the Persian Adaptation of the Core Outcome Measure Index in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain, Journal of Orthopaedic Science (2016)
14. Investigating the Responsiveness of the Persian Version of Functional Rating Index in Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: Brief Report, Tehran University Medical Journal (2018)
15. Occupational Performance 1 Year After a Distal Radius Fracture From the Perspective of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, American Journal of Occupational Therapy (2023)
16. Validation of the Functional Rating Index for the Assessment of Athletes With Neck Pain, World Journal of Orthopedics (2016)
17. Health-Care Access and Utilization Among Individuals With Low Back Pain in Iran: A Who-Ilar Copcord Study, BMC Health Services Research (2020)
18. Reliability and Validity of Athletes Disability Index Questionnaire, Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine (2018)
19. Iranian Brief Pain Inventory: Validation and Application in Elderly People With Cancer Pain, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (2017)
20. Reliability, Validity, and Cultural Adaptation of the Persian Version of the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (Ears) in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis, Journal of ISAKOS (2024)