Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
Comparison of Corneal Measurements Using Two Different Scheimpflug Analyzers in Sirius and Pentacam Devices Publisher Pubmed



Abdi P1 ; Atighehchian M1 ; Farsiani AR2
Authors

Source: Scientific Reports Published:2023


Abstract

The aim was to compare measurements of anterior segment biometry parameters using two Scheimpflug tomographies, Pentacam and Sirius to assess the agreement. Prospective cross-sectional observational study. A total of 60 eyes of 30 healthy subjects were included and evaluated with Pentacam followed by Sirius imaging. Corneal indices were performed with two modalities in both eyes including; apical corneal thickness (ACT), corneal thickness at pupil site(PCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), chamber angle, chamber volume, cornea volume, mean front keratometry (FKm), the radius of corneal curvature at the anterior and posterior surface in steep and flat meridian, anterior astigmatism values, pupil diameter, and horizontal corneal diameter. The Bland–Altman graph and ICC (intra-class correlation were used to establish an agreement and present the similarity of the findings. Most parameters showed perfect agreement. In both devices, the ICC was more than 0.91 in all measurements except for ACD (ICC = 0.820), cylinder axis (ICC = 0.520), TCT(ICC = 0.881), ACT(ICC = 0.672), PCT (ICC = 0.882), chamber angle (ICC = 0.362), pupil diameter(ICC = 0.137). Pentacam yielded higher values that were significant in five parameters including 3.47 μm for TCT, 4.29 µm for PCT, 10.03 mm3 for chamber volume,2.67 mm3 for cornea volume, and 1.49 mm for pupil diameter but there was only a statistically significant difference in cornea volume and pupil diameter (p-value < 0.001). However, in Pentacam only the chamber angle value was 6.44 mm3 lower than Sirius, with a statistically significant difference (p-value < 0.001). Although these two devices had some statistically different results, it seems that they have a good agreement and correlation in most parameters. © 2023, Springer Nature Limited.
Other Related Docs
5. Comparison of Scansys and Pentacam Hr in Healthy Eyes, Expert Review of Ophthalmology (2024)
13. Total Corneal Refractive Power and Shape in Down Syndrome, European Journal of Ophthalmology (2021)
14. Sirius®, Diagnostics in Ocular Imaging: Cornea# Retina# Glaucoma and Orbit (2020)
18. Myoring Implantation in Keratoconic Patients: 3 Years Follow-Up Data, Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research (2016)
20. Association Between Refractive Errors and Ocular Biometry in Iranian Adults, Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research (2015)